Procurement Policy Review: Consultations
The World Bank has a new Procurement Framework. After a 3-year review period, the Board of Directors approved a new Procurement Policy that supports clients to achieve value for money with integrity in delivering sustainable development. The Framework goes into effect in early 2016. All related documents are available on this website under "Details" for Phase 3 of the review.
Overview
About the Review
On July 21, 2015, the World Bank’s Board of Executive Directors approved a new policy governing procurement in projects financed by the Bank. The new Procurement Framework will allow the World Bank to better respond to the needs of client countries, while preserving robust procurement standards throughout Bank-supported projects.
The new Procurement Framework will go into effect in 2016. Value for money, sustainable development and integrity are the vision of the new approach. It will help clients get better development results as it gives the World Bank the space and capacity to significantly increase its support to help countries develop their own procurement systems. For the first time, the World Bank will allow any contract award decisions to be based on criteria other than lowest price, including quality and sustainability.
The World Bank started its first comprehensive overhaul of its procurement system in 2012. The goal of the reform was to move from a one-size-fits-all policy to a fit-for-purpose policy.
Consultations
The World Bank consulted widely during the review to ensure that the views of shareholders and stakeholders are represented. A first phase of consultations was held from May 2012 through February 2013. The second phase ran between August and December 2014. In total, the World Bank received input from about 5,000 stakeholders in close to 100 countries, representing government, the private sector, academia, and civil society.
Feedback from Consultations: Phase I
Input from consultations, Independent Advisory Group, World Bank staff, and thematic background studies conducted during the first phase of the review suggests that a new framework should reflect complexity and diversity, take into account proportionality, and support client institutions. Key inputs from the consultations are available in this brief summary. To see the executive summary of all feedback received during the consultations see here.
Feedback from Consultations: Phase II
Stakeholders widely welcomed the proposals of the draft Procurement Framework, especially the core principles of value for money and fit for purpose. Capacity building was at the top of the list of concerns of most stakeholders. A list of comments and Bank responses can be accessed here.
Phase 1
The first phase of the World Bank's review of its operational procurement policy and procedures led to a Proposed New Framework for Procurement in World Bank Investment Operations. This paper was endorsed by Executive Directors of the World Bank Group on November 15, 2013. The review team consulted with about 2,000 stakeholders from 96 countries between May 2012 and February 2013. To see the executive summary of all feedback received during the consultations see here. More feedback summaries available: by region, comments submitted online (PDF), and written statements sent by email (PDF).
Input from consultations, International Advisory Group on Procurement, World Bank staff, and thematic background studies from Phase 1 of the review suggests clearly that World Bank procurement should be guided by an approach that reflects complexity and diversity, value for money, and fit for purpose. Key inputs from the consultations and a few proposed central points for moving forward toward a new policy framework are available in this brief summary.
Detailed summary reports from consultations are available below.
Feedback summary reports
Executive Summary | Regional Summaries | Summaries of online feedback |
---|---|---|
Procurement Policy Review: Feedback from Consultations with External Stakeholders Executive Summary English|Arabic|French|Chinese |Russian |
Feedback summary for Eastern Europe and Central Asia (English|Russian) |
Summary of comments submitted online (English) |
Feedback summary for Latin America (English|Spanish) |
Summary of written comments submitted by governments, organizations, and companies (English) | |
Feedback summary for Middle East and North Africa (English|Arabic) | ||
Feedback summary for Sub-Saharan Africa (English|French) |
||
Feedback summary for Australia, East Asia, and the Pacific(English|Chinese) | ||
Feedback summary for South Asia (English) | ||
Feedback summary for United States and Canada (English) | ||
Feedback summary for Western Europe (English) |
Find the meeting details below:
Completed Meetings
Date | Title | Location |
---|---|---|
Multi-stakeholder Consultation |
Port-au-Prince, Haiti | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Rome, Italy | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Tashkent, Uzbekistan | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation (by videoconference with Washington, DC)
Documents
|
Moscow, Russian Federation | |
Consultation with African Development Bank
Documents
|
Tunis, Tunisia | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation (by videoconference: El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala, Nicaragua and Dominican Republic)
Documents
|
Panama City, Panama | |
Consultation with Inter-American Development Bank
Documents
|
Washington, DC, United States | |
Consultation with Government Officials
Documents
|
Washington, DC, United States | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Jakarta, Indonesia | |
Consultation with Government Officials of Khyber Pakhtunkkhwa and FATA
Documents
|
Islamabad, Pakistan | |
Roundtable on Procurement of Medical Equipment and Technology
Documents
|
Washington, DC, United States | |
Bilateral Meeting with Government Officials
Documents
|
Hanoi, Vietnam | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Hanoi, Vietnam | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation (by videoconference: Colombia)
Documents
|
Mexico City, Mexico | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Brasilia, Brazil | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Pasig City, Philippines | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Buenos Aires, Argentina | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Karachi, Pakistan | |
Consultation Meeting with Asian Development Bank
Documents
|
Manila, Philippines | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Montevideo, Uruguay | |
Consultations with Government Ministries and Business Sector |
Beijing, China | |
Meeting with Government Officials (by videoconference with Washington, DC)
Documents
|
Wellington, New Zealand | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Lahore, Pakistan | |
Bilateral Meeting with Government Officials
Documents
|
Tokyo, Japan | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Tokyo, Japan | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
La Paz, Bolivia | |
Consultation with Private Sector
Documents
|
Seoul, Korea, Republic of | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Asunción, Paraguay | |
Bilateral Meeting with Government Officials
Documents
|
Lima, Peru | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation (by audioconference: Samoa, Kiribati, Tonga)
Documents
|
Honiara, Solomon Islands | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation (by audioconference: Samoa, Kiribati, Tonga)
Documents
|
Dili, Timor-Leste | |
Consultation with Government Officials
Documents
|
Quetta, Pakistan | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Sydney, Australia | |
Bilateral Meeting with Government Officials
Documents
|
Canberra, Australia | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation (by videoconference: Niger, Mali, Mauritania, Guinea-Bissau, The Gambia, Cape-Verde)
Documents
|
Dakar, Senegal | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation (by videoconference: Chad, Burkina Faso, Benin, Togo, Cote d'Ivoire, Guinea)
Documents
|
Dakar, Senegal | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation (by videoconference: Angola, Botswana, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe)
Documents
|
Pretoria, South Africa | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation (by videoconference: Ethiopia, Rwanda, South Sudan, Tanzania and Uganda)
Documents
|
Nairobi, Kenya | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation (by videoconference: DRC, Congo, CAR, Chad, Burundi and Gabon)
Documents
|
Yaounde, Cameroon | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultations
Documents
|
New Delhi, India | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultations
Documents
|
New Delhi, India | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation (by videoconference: Ghana, Liberia and Sierra Leone)
Documents
|
Lagos, Nigeria | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultations
Documents
|
New Delhi, India | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation (by videoconference: Ghana, Liberia and Sierra Leone)
Documents
|
Abuja, Nigeria | |
Consultation with Individual Government Experts
Documents
|
New Delhi, India | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Ottawa, Canada | |
Bilateral Meeting with Government Officials
Documents
|
Ottawa, Canada | |
Supplemental Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
London, United Kingdom | |
Consultation with Federal Government Officials
Documents
|
Islamabad, Pakistan | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Washington, DC, United States | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Washington, DC, United States | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Dhaka, Bangladesh | |
Consultation with Public Sector
Documents
|
Dhaka, Bangladesh | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Kathmandu, Nepal | |
Consultation with Confederation of International Contractors' Associations
Documents
|
Paris, France | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation hosted by MEDEF
Documents
|
Paris, France | |
Consultation with European Commission
Documents
|
Brussels, Belgium | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Brussels, Belgium | |
Consultation with Private Sector
Documents
|
Berlin, Germany | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Berlin, Germany | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
London, United Kingdom | |
Bilateral Meeting with Government Officials
Documents
|
London, United Kingdom | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation hosted by the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation |
The Hague, Netherlands | |
Focus Group Discussion
Documents
|
Kabul, Afghanistan | |
Bilateral Meeting with Government Officials
Documents
|
Copenhagen, Denmark | |
Consultation with Confederation of Danish Industries
Documents
|
Copenhagen, Denmark | |
Consultation with UN Agencies
Documents
|
Copenhagen, Denmark | |
Consultation with Participants of the Workshop on Harmonizing Procurement Policies for Effective Regional Integration
Documents
|
Mombasa, Kenya | |
Consultation with Participants of Central Asia Regional Office Procurement Workshop
Documents
|
Issyk-Kul, Kyrgyz Republic | |
Consultation with participants of the Middle East and Northern Africa Procurement Conference
Documents
|
Amman, Jordan | |
Consultation with participants of the Eastern Europe and Central Asia Procurement Forum
Documents
|
Tirana, Albania |
Phase 2
The second stage of the review was launched on November 15, 2013. This phase focuses on the articulation and implementation of the new policy framework.
A New Proposed Procurement Framework: Phase II was presented to World Bank Executive Directors in July 2014. The World Bank is currently conducting multistakeholder consultations on this framework and the associated policy, procedures, and directives. Feedback received from stakeholders will be incorporated into the final policy, which is expected to be presented to the Board of Executive Directors for their approval in 2015.
Information about opportunities to engage with the Procurement Policy Review will be published here as it becomes available. For any questions regarding the review, please contact the Procurement Policy Review Team at [email protected]. Please also take a look at our Questions & Answers.
Working drafts of the draft procurement framework are available here:
Answers to questions posed in Phase 1 - Annex A
Consultation feedback summary and management response - Annex B
World Bank Directive: Procurement in IPF and Other Operational Procurement Matters (Working Draft) - Annex D
World Bank Procedure: Procurement in IPF and Other Operational Procurement Matters (Working Draft) - Annex E
Procurement Regulations for Borrowers (Working Draft) - Annex F
Comparison between current World Bank Procurement Policy (OP11.0) and draft Procurement Framework - Annex G
Comparison between current World Bank Procurement Procedure and draft Procurement Framework - Annex H
Comparison between current World Bank Procurement Guidelines and draft Procurement Regulations for Borrowers -Annex I
Proposed Methodology to Assess Alternative Procurement Arrangements in Borrower Implementing Agencies for Procurements financed under IPF (Working Draft) - Annex J
Procurement Framework Implementation Plan (Working Draft) - Annex K
Procurement Framework Implementation Timeline (Working Draft) - Annex K1
Members of the GPA, full, Acceding and observing - Annex L
Completed Meetings
Date | Title | Location |
---|---|---|
Multi-Stakeholder Procurement Consultation (Academia and Civil Society) |
Washington, DC, United States | |
Videoconference: multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Bamako, Mali | |
Consultation with multi-stakeholders
Documents
|
Washington, DC, United States | |
Consultation with Government Officials
Documents
|
New Delhi, India | |
Consultation with private sector
Documents
|
New Delhi, India | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Dakar, Senegal | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Lagos, Nigeria | |
Consultation with Development Partners
Documents
|
Lilongwe, Malawi | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Lilongwe, Malawi | |
Consultation with government officials
Documents
|
Lilongwe, Malawi | |
Consultation with Government Officials
Documents
|
Washington, DC, United States | |
Consultation with Government Officials
Documents
|
Nairobi, Kenya | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia | |
Multi-stakeholder consultation (private sector and civil society)
Documents
|
Moscow, Russian Federation | |
Consultation with government officials
Documents
|
Moscow, Russian Federation | |
Multi-stakeholder consultation (by videoconference: Astana and Almaty, Kazakhstan; Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic; Dushanbe, Tajikistan; Tashkent, Uzbekistan) |
Moscow, Russian Federation | |
Consultation with Private Sector
Documents
|
The Hague, Netherlands | |
Consultation with government officials
Documents
|
The Hague, Netherlands | |
Consultation with private sector
Documents
|
Madrid, Spain | |
Consultation with government officials
Documents
|
Madrid, Spain | |
Multi-stakeholder consultation
Documents
|
Beijing, China | |
Consultation with Central and Provincial Government agencies and project management offices
Documents
|
Beijing, China | |
Consultation with private sector
Documents
|
Rabat, Morocco | |
Consultation with Government Officials
Documents
|
Rabat, Morocco | |
Videoconference: Consultation with private sector
Documents
|
Hanoi, Vietnam | |
Consultation with government officials
Documents
|
Hanoi, Vietnam | |
Multi-stakeholder consultation (private sector and civil society)
Documents
|
Tokyo, Japan | |
Consultation with government officials
Documents
|
Tokyo, Japan | |
Consultation with government officials
Documents
|
Wellington, New Zealand | |
Consultation with government officials
Documents
|
Castries, St. Lucia | |
Multi-stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Castries, St. Lucia | |
Consultation with civil society and private sector
Documents
|
Jakarta, Indonesia | |
Consultation with government and development partners
Documents
|
Jakarta, Indonesia | |
Consultation with private sector
Documents
|
Montreal, Canada | |
Consultation with private sector
Documents
|
Ottawa, Canada | |
Consultation with government and development partners
Documents
|
Manila, Philippines | |
Consultation with Asian Development Bank
Documents
|
Manila, Philippines | |
Consultation with government officials
Documents
|
Ottawa, Canada | |
Multi-stakeholder consultation
Documents
|
Manila, Philippines | |
Consultation with private sector
Documents
|
Manila, Philippines | |
Multi-stakeholder consultation
Documents
|
Sydney, Australia | |
Consultation with government officials
Documents
|
Sydney, Australia | |
Consultation with government officials from the Pacific Islands
Documents
|
Sydney, Australia | |
Consultation with government officials
Documents
|
Mexico City, Mexico | |
Multi-stakeholder consultation
Documents
|
Lima, Peru | |
Multi-stakeholder consultation
Documents
|
Cairo, Egypt, Arab Republic of | |
Multi-Stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Brasilia, Brazil | |
Consultation with development partners
Documents
|
Cairo, Egypt, Arab Republic of | |
Private Sector Consultation
Documents
|
Tbilisi, Georgia | |
Consultation with government officials
Documents
|
Tbilisi, Georgia | |
Multi-stakeholder consultation
Documents
|
Rome, Italy | |
Consultation with government officials
Documents
|
London, United Kingdom | |
Consultation with civil society
Documents
|
London, United Kingdom | |
Multi-Stakeholder Consultation
Documents
|
Brussels, Belgium | |
Consultation with Civil Society
Documents
|
Brussels, Belgium | |
Consultation with Private Sector
Documents
|
Paris, France | |
Consultation with government officials
Documents
|
Berlin, Germany | |
Consultation with Private Sector
Documents
|
Berlin, Germany | |
Consultation with Enterprise Ireland
Documents
|
Dublin, Ireland | |
Consultation with British Expertise
Documents
|
London, United Kingdom |
Submissions
Date | Title | Contributors |
---|---|---|
DITTA Contribution Notes |
||
Joint Submission from the International Federation of Consulting Engineers (FIDIC), the Confederation of International Contractors' Associations (CICA), and the European International Contractors (EIC) |
Frank Kehlenbach | |
Comments from Transparency International
Documents
|
Daniel Dudis | |
Submission of the Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed)
Documents
|
Joseph Gatewood | |
Comments from the MedTech Industry in Canada, represented by MEDEC
Documents
|
Brian Lewis | |
Submission from Medtronic, Inc. on Proposed New Procurement Framework |
Trevor Gunn | |
Comments on World Bank’s Procurement Reform Phase II from The George Washington University Law School |
George Washington University Law School | |
Comments submitted by Thomson Reuters |
Donald G. Peele, Jr. | |
BDI Position Paper on the World Bank's Proposed New Procurement Policy Framework
Documents
|
The Federation of German Industries (BDI) |
Phase 3
The Committee on Development Effectiveness (CODE) and the Audit Committee of the World Bank's Executive Directors endorsed the proposed New Procurement Framework for Procurement in Investment Project Financing: Phase II on June 10, 2015, and recommended presentation of the draft Procurement Policy to the full Board for final approval. The Framework was submitted to the Board on June 22, 2015 and was disclosed to the public at the same time.
A full Board discussion is scheduled for July 21, 2015. If Executive Directors approve the new Procurement Policy, World Bank Management will finalize and issue the Procurement Directive, Procedure and Regulations and replace the current Procurement Operational Policy (OP 11.00), Procurement Bank Policy (BP 11.00) and the Procurement Guidelines with the new Procurement Framework. Management will also set a day for effectiveness of the new Framework in Fiscal Year 2016, after assessing the readiness of the institution to transition to the new Procurment Framework.